![]() Step 2: Install UniFi Controller Follow these instructions. I highly recommend doing as much preconfiguration in the Raspberry Pi Imager as you can. Glossary: 4B = 4 Model B 3B+ = 3 Model B+ Step 1: Set up the Raspberry Pi 4B Follow these instructions. 192.168.0.25 to reach machines on the How to Migrate UniFi Controller from a Debian 11 on a Raspberry Pi 3B+ to Debian 12 on a 4B What this means is WireGuard forces you to use IP addresses, e.g. I’ll keep this simple: WireGuard doesn’t support private hostname resolution out of the box □□□ Supporting it – if possible at all – is pretty involved if you already have a working Pi-hole DNS + DHCP setup. You can set these manually in Why you should not use WireGuard Step 2 Reinstall Process Explorer with the Run as admin, Latest, 圆4, & Local machine options set. To fix this: Step 1 Uninstall Process Explorer. If it’s not there, that means it wasn’t installed in the right context. Update: you can opt out of the 32-bit builds by running reg add HKCU\Software\Google\Update\ClientState\\cohort /v hint /d asan-optout /f in an elevated command prompt after reinstalling the 64-bit build.Ĭan’t find Process Explorer after installing it via winget? Do thisįirst of all, Process Explorer should be located at C:\Program Files\WinGet\Packages\*. I’ll let you decide the morality of pushing broken 32-bit builds to 64-bit users, but at least we have an answer.Ĭurrently the only fix I know of is an in-place reinstall. We are working on making the instrumentation work natively in 64-bit mode, but that is at least 6 months away.įinally, if the instrumentation is rendering your browser completely unusable we do have an opt-out mechanism in place. In order to increase the audience of potential users we also ship to 64-bit users, intentionally downgrading them to 32-bit builds for a day. – Unfortunately, the technology is 32-bit only right now. The next days update still has the same 1 in 20 chance, so most often you should end up back on a non-instrumented build. That is, for any day’s update you have a 1 in 20 chance of receiving an ASAN instrumented build. – To further limit user pain we randomly select 1 in every 20 users every day. – To limit user pain we filter for machines with sufficient memory, as there is a significant memory overhead to the instrumentation. As mentions, if you’re on one of these builds you’ll see a ‘SyzyASan’ label if you navigate to chrome://version. These builds contain instrumentation that track down heap memory errors, and provide extremely useful bug reports to Chrome developers. Some background: We’ve recently started shipping ASAN instrumented builds of Chrome to canary users. It’s most likely that you received one of these build (chrome://version will tell you), and that you’d be back to 64-bit canary the next day. ![]() The most frequent case is an ASAN build to help us find memory-related bugs in Chrome. On occasion, we send a 32-bit build to 64-bit installs. ![]() Turns out Google deliberately pushes 32-bit builds to 64-bit installs on high RAM – apparently ≥ 8GB, from my experience – machines to find memory-related bugs. At this point I knew for sure the error wasn’t my doing, so I filed a bug. ![]() That fixed the problem for a few days until it returned. At first I figured I’d either absent mindedly installed the 32-bit build or forgotten to switch over to the 64-bit build when it first became available, so I reinstalled the 64-bit build in-place. When I opened Task Manager to kill Canary, though, I saw this: Pretty sure I have Canary 64-bit, so why are 32-bit processes showing up?Ĭanary had 32-bit processes, despite the 64-bit installation. A few weeks ago, I noticed Chrome Canary 64-bit would either refuse to launch (a window) or would launch as Not Responding in Windows.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |